S to correct for differences in the proportion of missing data

Материал из WikiSyktSU
Перейти к: навигация, поиск

More recent data on the birth orderTable 3 Absolute and relative risk of recurrent congenital anomaly PubMed ID:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28497120 in the second pregnancy for Ed criteria, apparently an everincreasing percentage from the worldwide population, are similar anomalies (i.e. from a different group), by congenital anomaly group/subtype in the first pregnancyFrom the same group (similar) Cases 91 (134-210) (112-315) (97-355) (47-443) (62-434) 4 581 197 238 365 152 247 201 3 325 (136-759) 51.44 (21.39-123.7) PubMed ID:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24652678 4 4326 143 (1319-7928) (46-435) 590.8 32.61 (236.7-1475.0) (10.44-101.9) PubMed ID:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28497120 in the second pregnancy for similar anomalies (i.e. from the same group) and dissimilar anomalies (i.e.