Service Animals, Emotional Support, and Guide Dogs4834918

Материал из WikiSyktSU
Версия от 21:55, 28 сентября 2020; RegeniajvwxypleiwZupfer (обсуждение | вклад) (Новая страница: «Sadly, many people are asking whether "service animal" laws are being abused by people who want to scam the device. There have been news stories, articles, opini…»)

(разн.) ← Предыдущая | Текущая версия (разн.) | Следующая → (разн.)
Перейти к: навигация, поиск

Sadly, many people are asking whether "service animal" laws are being abused by people who want to scam the device.

There have been news stories, articles, opinion pieces and other editorials where people rant and complain about people they believe to be abusing the system. You hear some complain that they to sit near a dog at a restaurant which they don't believe is a "real" service dog, forms of languages complain their neighbors possess a pet in a "no pet" building since they claimed the pet is emotional support animal registration.

A few of the commentary posseses an indignant tone, and a few people are downright angry.

How can this affect those that legitimately own and make use of a service animal to raised their lives? In several ways.

For one, it could it harder to navigate bureaucracy on the planet when your claim of the disability as well as your service or emotional support animal's status is questioned. If your landlord or business proprietor has heard negative stories claiming that some people are abusing the machine, it can cause these phones look suspiciously in any way claimants.

Some landlord and companies have begun requesting proof of status, although asking for written or other evidence is not always legal, and although many those who own legitimate service animals and emotional support animals have not taken advantage of registering them, and so have no such documentation to make.

It is the suspicious attitude and illegal demands of some landlords and business people that make registrations services like the Service Animal Registry of California so important legitimate owners.

Although registration is optional, it can help shortcut the housing rental and business access issues when the owner can produce a simple document that may often match the owner or landlord. Also, when using public spaces, it's easier to hand over a document with a simple sentence stating, "This is really a service animal" and letting another party see the information, instead of having a long-winded protracted conversation (or even worse, argument) in public places, with onlookers listening in and gathering round the discussion.

So, carry out some people scam the machine, or game what the law states? Sadly, the answer is "probably yes." In life, there is always room for abuse and individuals can make an effort to take advantage of many systems that people as a society set up to protect the rights of those that need such protection. As an example, many drivers falsely display disabled parking placards to take advantage of free and convenient parking. As well as the number of people who lie on their tax returns, claim improper tax deductions, abuse retail store return policies, or do other bad acts.

But that percentage of abuse, which around service animal laws is hopefully small, is arguably a very small price to pay when compared to the higher goal of promoting access and equality for many.

In the end, you cannot control any system to make it 100% abuse proof. So tolerating the few people who scam service animal laws may be the price we gladly pay to make sure that the disabled in the great state of California have equal access under law.